Results regarding the impact of environmental factors on Sedum planting elevations

Authors

  • Alex-Péter Cotoz University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design Author
  • Valentin-Sebastian Dan University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design Author
  • Tincuța-Marta Gocan University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design Author
  • Sandor Rózsa University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design Author
  • Ileana Andreica University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Economics Author
  • Maria Cantor University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design Author

Keywords:

Sedum varieties, Exposure, Climatic conditions, Plant adaptation, Green infrastructure

Abstract

Sedum plants, renowned for their resilience and adaptability to adverse conditions, may exhibit preferences influenced by their place of origin. This study builds on prior research and examines the relationship between elevation, climate, and Sedum plant survival and branching patterns. Our aim was to understand how these plants develop and survive in diverse climatic contexts, particularly when planted in containers. Conducted in an area marked by subtle temperature fluctuations, increased humidity, and variations in precipitation and storm frequencies, this research investigates the effects of elevation and climatic exposure on three Sedum varieties planted in different culture substrates without providing additional water or fertilizers. The challenges posed by extreme climatic conditions necessitate careful consideration of plant selection for green roofs. Sedum species can withstand drought, sun exposure, wind, and fluctuating temperatures, making them prime candidates for harsh environments. Through meticulous analyses, alterations were uncovered in plant survival rates and branching tendencies, highlighting the critical role of local climatic conditions and elevation in shaping plant adaptation and growth. Marking three height intervals, h1 (0-25 cm), h2 (25-50 cm), and h3 (50-75 cm), we uncovered that SS'PW' preferred lower elevations, especially in h1 (0-25 cm), with highest survival rates in commercial mix substrate (C.M.). SS'CB' favored h2 (25-50 cm) across all substrates. SS'P' had mixed preferences, showing higher survival rates in h2 with C.M. but developing more branches in h3 (50-75 cm). These findings enrich our understanding of plant responses to environmental stimuli, emphasizing the importance of an integrated approach in planning and managing green spaces. By employing informed plant selection and cultivation methodologies, this research contributes to the foundation of sustainability and resilience within urban vegetation systems, fostering the development of greener and more robust urban environments.

References

Abrams, L. (1994). Crassulaceae. In Illustrated Flora of Pacific States (pp. 342-346). California: Stanford University Press.

Arora, A., Sairam, R. K., & Srivastava, G. C. (2002). Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants. Current science, 1227-1238.

Baerenfaller, K., Massonnet, C., Walsh, S., Baginsky, S., Bühlmann, P., Hennig, L., ... & Gruissem, W. (2012). Systems‐based analysis of Arabidopsis leaf growth reveals adaptation to water deficit. Molecular systems biology, 8(1), 606.

Blum, A. (2010). Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer Science & Business Media.

Borland, A. M., & Dodd, A. N. (2002). Carbohydrate partitioning in crassulacean acid metabolism plants: reconciling potential conflicts of interest. Functional Plant Biology, 29(6), 707-716.

Cabahug, R. A. M., Nam, S. Y., Lim, K. B., Jeon, J. K., & Hwang, Y. J. (2018). Propagation techniques for ornamental succulents. 화훼연구, 26(3), 90-101.

Cotoz, A. P., Dan, V. S., Gocan, T. M., Andreica, I., Rózsa, S., & Cantor, M. (2023). Sedum growth patterns under different pedoclimatic conditions. Plants, 12(14), 2739.

Cotoz, A. P., Dan, V. S., Gocan, T. M., Andreica, I., Rózsa, S., & Cantor, M. (2023). Sedum Survival and Ramification Patterns Under Different pedoclimatic Conditions, Romanian Journal of Horticulture, Volume IV, 2023: 185-192, On line ISSN 2734 – 8083, PRINT ISSN 2734 – 7656, DOI 10.51258/RJH.2023.21

Du, P., Arndt, S. K., & Farrell, C. (2019). Is plant survival on green roofs related to their drought response, water use or climate of origin? Science of the Total Environment, 667, 25-32.

Durhman, A. K., Rowe, D. B., & Rugh, C. L. (2006). Effect of watering regimen on chlorophyll fluorescence and growth of selected green roof plant taxa. HortScience, 41(7), 1623-1628.

Durhman, A. K., Rowe, D. B., & Rugh, C. L. (2007). Effect of substrate depth on initial growth, coverage, and survival of 25 succulent green roof plant taxa. HortScience, 42(3), 588-595.

Emilsson, T. (2008). Vegetation development on extensive vegetated green roofs: Influence of substrate composition, establishment method and species mix. Ecological engineering, 33(3-4), 265-277.

Fao of the United Nations. (2007). Adaptation to climate change in agriculture, forestry and fisheries: perspective, framework and priorities. Viale delle Terme di Caracalla-00100 Rome, Italy.

Farrell, C., Mitchell, R. E., Szota, C., Rayner, J. P., & Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Green roofs for hot and dry climates: Interacting effects of plant water use, succulence and substrate. Ecological Engineering, 49, 270-276.

Farrell, C.; Szota, C.; Williams, N.S.; Arndt, S.K. (2013). High water users can be drought tolerant: Using physiological traits for green roof plant selection. Plant Soil, 372, 177–193.

Francis, J., Hall, G., Murphy, S., & Rayner, J. (2014). Growing Green Guide: A guide to green roofs, walls and facades in Melbourne and Victoria, Australia. Report prepared for State of Victoria through the Department of Environment and Primary Industries.

Gurevitch, J., Teeri, J. A., & Wood, A. M. (1986). Differentiation among populations of Sedum wrightii (Crassulaceae) in response to limited water availability: water relations, CO 2 assimilation, growth and survivorship. Oecologia, 70, 198-204.

Ingram D. L., Ruter J., Martin, C. A. (2017). Reducing Heat Stress to Container-grown Plants. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, HO-119

Kirschstein, C. (1997). Die dürreresistenz einiger Sedum-arten. Abgeleitet aus der Bedeutung der Wurzelsaugspannung-Teil, 1, 252-256.

Kirschstein, C. (1997). Die dürreresistenz einiger Sedum-arten. Abgeleitet aus der Bedeutung der Wurzelsaugspannung-Teil, 2, 252-256.

Krzyżak, J., Rusinowski, S., Sitko, K., Szada-Borzyszkowska, A., Borgulat, J., Stec, R., ... & Pogrzeba, M. (2023). The Effect of Combined Drought and Temperature Stress on the Physiological Status of Calcareous Grassland Species as Potential Candidates for Urban Green Infrastructure. Plants, 12(10), 2003.

Lee, J. H., Lim, Y. S., & Nam, S. Y. (2021). Optimization of shading levels, potting media, and fertilization rates on the vegetative growth of Sedum zokuriense Nakai. 화훼연구, 29(4), 239-246.

Lu, J., Yuan, J. G., Yang, J. Z., & Yang, Z. Y. (2014). Responses of morphology and drought tolerance of Sedum lineare to watering regime in green roof system: A root perspective. Urban forestry & urban greening, 13(4), 682-688.

Ma, Y., Li, X., Gu, Z., & Li, J. A. (2019). Leaf color and growth change of Sedum rubrotinctum caused by two commercial chemical products. HortScience, 54(3), 434-444.

Mimura, N. (2010). Scope and roles of adaptation to climate change. In Adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change (pp. 131-140). Springer Japan.

Monterusso, M. A., Rowe, D. B., & Rugh, C. L. (2005). Establishment and persistence of Sedum spp. and native taxa for green roof applications. HortScience, 40(2), 391-396.

Nektarios, P. A., Ntoulas, N., Nydrioti, E., Kokkinou, I., Bali, E. M., & Amountzias, I. (2015). Drought stress response of Sedum sediforme grown in extensive green roof systems with different substrate types and depths. Scientia Horticulturae, 181, 52-61.

Radhakrishnan, M., Kenzhegulova, I., Eloffy, M.G., Ibrahim, W.A., Zevenbergen, C.; Pathirana, A. (2019). Development of context specific sustainability criteria for selection of plant species for green urban infrastructure: The case of Singapore. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 20, 316–325.

Seghatoleslami, M. J., Kafi, M., & Majidi, E. (2008). Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. Pak. J. Bot, 40(4), 1427-1432.

Stephenson, R. (1994). Sedum: cultivated stonecrops. Timber Press Inc.

Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2002). Plant Physiology Third Ed Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, MA, USA.

Thomas, R. P. (2010). Proceedings of the Global Forum on Salinization and Climate Change (GFSCC2010). World Soil Resources Reports, (105), 25–29.

Ting, I.P., (1985). Crassulacean acid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36,595–622

Toma, F.; Sorina, P. (2020). Floriculture and floral compositions, Ed. Total Publishing Bucharest, Romania, pp. 288-289.

Wolf, D., & Lundholm, J. T. (2008). Water uptake in green roof microcosms: Effects of plant species and water availability. Ecological Engineering, 33(2), 179-186.

Zaharia, A. Jucan, D A, Buta, E. (2016). Reaction of Sedum spurium „Purpurteppich” Exposed to Thermal and Hydric Stress. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture. 73. 279. 10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:12365.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles