Evaluation of chlorophyll content as  selection criteria for drought tolerance in wheat

Authors

  • Adriana Ciulca University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author
  • Giancarla Velicevici University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author
  • Mihaela Moatar University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author
  • Camelia Tulcan University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author
  • Dorin Camen University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author
  • Sorin Ciulca University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara Author

Keywords:

Water stress, photosynthetic pigments, wheat crosses

Abstract

Drought and water deficit are two major limiting factors in wheat production. The genotypes having high chlorophyll content express a good photosynthesis rate and ability to tolerate different level of drought. As such, the evaluation of chlorophyll content can be an effective method of selecting tolerant wheat genotypes.The goal of this work was to assess the performance and improvement potential for chlorophyll content in case of 21 F1 crosses between seven wheat varieties, genetically and ecologically differentiated. For most of the combinations the inheritance of chlorophyll content was controlled by over dominance effects, associated generally with a decrease of this trait. For Fundulea 4 x Apache and Alex x Apache the incomplete dominance leads to a decrease of chlorophyll content. For Xenos x Alex the complete dominance is acting with a negative effect in the inheritance of this trait, while for Fundulea 4 x Xenos the dominance effects are very low. The crosses Fundulea 4 x GKKapos, Fundulea 4 x Alex and Xenos x Turda 2000 showed the highest potential to improve the chlorophyll content in wheat. In this regard, those combinations can be used as genitors or as selection material.

References

Ahmad, A., Aslam, Z., Javed, T., Hussain, S., Raza, A., Shabbir, R., Mora Poblete, F,, Saee, T,, Zulfiqar, F., Ali. M.M (2022), Screening of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance through agronomic and hysiological response. Agronomy, 2, 287;

Ahmed, H.G.M.-D., Sajjad, M., Li, M., Azmat, M.A., Rizwan, M., Maqsood, R.H., Khan, S.H. (2019), Selection criteria for drought-tolerant bread wheat genotypes at seedling stage. Sustainability, 11, 2584;

Anjum, S.A., Xie, X., Wang, L., Saleem, M.F., Man, C., Lei, W. (2011), Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9), pp. 2026-2032;

Bano, H., Athar, H.U.R., Zafar, Z.U., Kalaji, H.M., Ashraf, M. (2021), Linking changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence with drought stress susceptibility in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek]. Physiol. Plantarum, 172, pp. 1244–1254;

Barraclough, P.B., Kyte, J. (2001), Effect of water stress on chlorophyll meter readings in winter wheat. In: Plant nutrition - Food security and sustainability of agro-ecosystems, Horst, W.J., M.K. Schenk, A. Burkert, N. Claassen and H. Flessa et al. (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands;

Bojović, B., Marković, A. (2009), Correlation between nitrogen and chlorophyll content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Kragujev J Sci , 31, pp. 69–74;

Chowdhury, M.K., Hasan, M., Bahadur, M., Islam, M.R., Hakim, M.A., Iqbal, M.A., et al. (2021), Evaluation of drought tolerance of some wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) genotypes through phenology, growth, and physiological indices. Agronomy 11, 1792;

Ciulca, S. (2006), Metodologii de experimentare în agricultură şi biologie (Experimental methodologies in agriculture and biology). Ed. Agroprint. Timişoara;

Fonseca, S., Patterson, F.L. (1968), Hybrid vigor in seven parental diallel cross in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci., 8, pp. 85–88;

Gan, Y.T., Millerb, P.R., McConkeya, B.G., Zentnera, R.P., Stevensonc, F.C., McDonalda, C.L. (2003), Influence of diverse cropping sequences on durum wheat yield and protein in the semiarid northern great plains. Agronomy Journal, 95, pp. 245-252;

Ghanem, H.E., Al-Farouk, M.O. (2024), Wheat drought tolerance: Morpho-physiological criteria, stress indexes, and yield responses in newly sand soils. J Plant Growth Regul;

Hill, J., Becker, H.C., Tigerstedt, P.M.A. (1998), Quantitative and ecological aspects of plant breeding.. Chapman and Hall, London;

Islam, M.R., Haque, K.M.S., Akter, N., Karim, M.A. (2014), Leaf chlorophyll dynamics in wheat based on SPAD meter reading and its relationship with grain yield. Sci Agric, 4, pp.13–18;

Kaiser, W.M., Kaiser, G., Schöner, S., Neimanis, S. (1981), Photosynthesis under osmotic stress. Differential recovery of photosynthetic activities of stroma enzymes, intact chloroplasts and leaf slices after exposure to high solute concentrations. Planta, 153, pp. 430-435;

Lv, S., Feng, K., Peng, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Bian, J., Nie, X. (2018), Comparative analysis of the transcriptional response of tolerant and sensitive wheat genotypes to drought stress in field conditions. Agronomy, 8, 247;

Mauchamp, A., Methy, M. (2004), Submergence-induced damage of photosynthetic apparatus in Phragmites australis. Environ Exp Bot, 51, pp. 227–235;

Monostori, I., Árendás, T., Hoffman, B. et al. (2016), Relationship between SPAD value and grain yield can be affected by cultivar, environment and soil nitrogen content in wheat. Euphytica, 211(1), pp. 103–112;

Naroui Rad, M.R., Kadir, M.A., Yusop, M.R. (2012),. Genetic behaviour for plant capacity to produce chlorophyll in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under drought stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3), pp. 415-420;

Nikolaeva, M.K., Maevskaya, S.N., Shugaev, A.G., Bukhov, N.G. (2010), Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 57(1), pp. 87–95;

Peršić, V., Ament, A., Antunović Dunić, J., Drezner, G., Cesar, V. (2022), PEG-induced physiological drought for screening winter wheat genotypes sensitivity – integrated biochemical and chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 987702;

Saadalla, M.M. (2001), Water use efficiency and its components of wheat genotypes for varying droght tolerance. Annals of Agriculture Science Cairo, 46, pp. 85-102;

Shen, J., Guo, M.-J., Wang, Y.-G., Yuan, X.-Y., Wen, Y.-Y., Song, X.-E., et al. (2020), Humic acid improves the physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of millet seedlings under drought stress. Plant Signaling Behav, 15, 1774212;

Waines, J.G. (1994), High temperature stress in wild wheats and spring wheats. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 21, pp. 705-715;

Wasaya, A., Manzoor, S., Yasir, T.A., Sarwar, N., Mubeen, K., Ismail, I.A., Raza, A., Rehman, A., Hossain, A., EL Sabagh, A. (2021), Evaluation of fourteen bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by observing gas exchange parameters, relative water and chlorophyll content, and yield attributes under drought stress. Sustainability, 13, 4799;

Yang, Y., Nan, R., Mi, T., Song, Y., Shi, F., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Sun, F., Xi, Y., Zhang, C. (2023), Rapid and nondestructive evaluation of wheat chlorophyll under drought stress using hyperspectral imaging. Int J Mol Sci, 24(6), 5825;

Zaharieva, M., Gaulin, E., Havaux, M., Acevedo, E., Monneveux, P. (2001), Drought and heat responses in the wild wheat relative Aegilops Roth: potential interest wheat improvement. Crop Science, 41, pp. 1321-1329.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-18

Issue

Section

Articles