Comparative analysis of dead wood in managed and virgin forests in the beech stands

Authors

  • Oliver MERCE INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author
  • Ilie CANTAR INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author
  • Daniel TURCU INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author
  • Catalin CIONTU INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author
  • Ciprian VASILE INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author
  • Nicolae CADAR INCDS Marin Drăcea - Station Timisoara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59463/n88x2m24

Abstract

Dead wood is an indicator of forest biodiversity, forming key habitats for many species. In this study they were compared the quantities of dead wood from 4 sample plots from managed forest and 4 from virgin forest from beech stands in Semenic Mountains. Analyzing the two types of forests revealed differences in the amount of dead wood. Therefore, in the sample plots from the virgin forest the mean quantity of fallen dead wood was 54.46 m3 ha-1, while in the managed forest the mean quantity was much lower: 11.32 m3 ha-1. Regarding the standing dead wood, the mean quantity in the virgin forest was 28.05 m3 ha-1, while in the managed forest the quantity was much lower: 11.38 m3 ha-1. As regards the distribution by decomposition classes, the absence of dead wood in a few classes was observed, in both types of forests. The largest proportion of standing dead wood in the sample plots from 1200 m altitude was in the second decomposition class in both forest types, while in the sample plots at 1350 m altitude it was in the third decomposition class both in the virgin and managed forest. In the case of the fallen dead wood, the largest proportion in the sample plots of 1350 m altitude was in the fourth decomposition class for both forest types, while at 1200 m altitude was in the second class for the managed forest and the third and fourth class for the virgin forest. The diversity of dead wood regarding the three categories of elements studied indicates, in general, higher values for the vrgin forest.

References

Brassel, P., Brandli, U. (1999), Inventaiere forestier national suise. Resultats du deuxieme inventaire 1993-1995, Berne, Stuttgart, Viene

Bujoczek, L., Bujoczek, M., Zięba, S. (2021), How much, why and where? Deadwood in forest ecosystems: The case of Poland. Ecological Indicators. 121. 1-14.

Cavalli, R., Donini, F. (2003), Possible management actions to increase the amount of dead and marcescent wood, Proceeding of the International Symposium “Dead wood: a key to biodiversity”, Mantova.

Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E., Ódor, P., Standovár, T., & Roženbergar, D., Diaci, J., Wijdeven, S., Meyer, P., Winter, S., Vrška, T. (2005), Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management. 210. 267-282.

Debeljak, M. (2006), Coarse woody debris in virgin and managed forest. Ecological indicators. , 2006, Vol. 6(4), p.733-742

Dudley, N., Vallauri, D. (2004), Dead wood – living forests, WWF Report

Fridman, J., Walheim, M. (2000), Amount, structure and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden, Forest Ecology and Management, 131

Keller, M. (Ed.). (2011), Swiss National Forest Inventory. Manual of the Field Survey 2004–2007. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, CH.

Keren, S., Diaci, J. (2018), Comparing the Quantity and Structure of Deadwood in Selection Managed and Old-Growth Forests in South-East Europe. Forests. 9.

Oettel, J., Lapin, K., Kindermann, G., Steiner, H., Schweinzer, K.M., Frank, G., Essl, F. (2020), Patterns and drivers of deadwood volume and composition in different forest types of the Austrian natural forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management. 463

Oheimb, Gv., Westphal, Ch., Hardtle, W. (2007). Diversity and spatiotemporal dynamics of dead wood in a temperate near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica). European Journal Forest Research 126:359-370.

Petritan, I.C., Mihăilă, V.V., Yuste, J.C., Bouriaud, O. and Petritan, A.M. (2023), Deadwood density, C stocks and their controlling factors in a beech-silver fir mixed virgin European forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 539.

Stănescu, V., Șofletea, N., Popescu, O. (1997), Flora forestieră lemnoasă a României. Editura Ceres, București.

Tomescu, R.; Târziu, D.; Gancz, V.; Petrila, M.; Teodosiu, M.; Turcu, D.O.; Brad, R.; Şteţca, I. (2004 – 2006), Studiul factorilor de stabilitate in ecosistemele forestiere naturale. Evaluarea posibilităţilor de ameliorare a practicilor silvice în vederea gospodăririi durabile a pădurilor / A Study of the Stability Factors in Natural Forest Ecosystems. Evaluation of the Possibilities to Ameliorate the Silvicultural Practices for the Sustainable Management of the Forests. Forest Research and Management Institute (ICAS) Bucharest, The Ministry Of Agriculture, Forests and Rural Development, 3 volumes.

Vallauri, D. (2003), Dead wood, a gap in French managed forests, Proceeding of the International Symposium “Dead wood: a key to biodiversity”, Mantova.

Vasile D., Petritan A.M., Tudose N.C., Toiu F.L., Scarlatescu V., Petritan I.C. (2017), Structure and Spatial Distribution of Dead Wood in Two Temperate Old-Growth Mixed European Beech Forests. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45(2): 639-645.

Vitkova, L., Bače, R., Svoboda, M. Kjucukov, P. (2018), Deadwood management in Central European forests: Key considerations for practical implementation. Forest Ecology and Management. 429.

xxx. (2019), The FSC National Forest Stewardship Standard of Romania

xxx. (2021), Amenajamentul Ocolului Silvic Văliug – UP II, UP XII

xxx. (2015), Amenajamentul Ocolului Silvic Nera – UP II, UP III

https://earth.google.com/web/

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles