Low-productivity forests in Working Unit III Jitin

Authors

  • Georgeta BLAJ University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara Author
  • Cornelia BUZATU-GOANTA University of Life Sciences ”King Mihai I” from Timisoara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59463/hyje3k56

Keywords:

site quality, stand density, natural stand, artificial stand, modified stand

Abstract

Working Unit III Jitin, administrated by Forest District Oravita, Caras Severin Forest Directorate is located in The South of the Banat Mountain and occupies the high hilly of Semenic. The most representative unit of relief is the slope. Low-productivity forests occupied 39% of the total area of the working unit. There are low-productivity natural stands, low-productivity modified stands, middle-productivity modified stands and low-productivity artificial stands. The research has focused on low-productivity modified stands and low-productivity artificial stands representing 6.5% of the working unit forest to highlight the potential to increase productivity. The modified stands analyses are forests with a high percentage of European hornbeam and manna ash. The artificial stands are plantations with pine and European beech mixed with species naturally regenerated by seed or sprout like sessile oak, manna ash, silver fir and different hardwood species. There are also black locusts regenerated naturally by sprouting. Of the 259.16 ha of low-productivity stands, 93% are stands located in low-productivity habitats (low-productivity modified stands and low-productivity artificial stands), 7% stands in middle-productivity habitat (low-productivity modified stands – 3% and middle-productivity modified stands-4%).

References

Anonymous (2018 a), Amenajamentul silvic al Unității de Producție III Jitin, Ocolul Silvic Oravița. p.455

Anonymous (2018 b), Studiul General al Ocolului Silvic Oravița. p.262

Bontemps, J.D., & Bouriaud, O. (2014), Predictive approaches to forest site productivity: recent trends, challenges and future perspectives. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 87(1), pp. 109–128.

Chase, J. (2010), Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science (New York, N.Y.). 328, pp. 1388-91

Duncker, P., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Gundersen, P., Katzensteiner, K., Jong, J., Ravn, H., Smith, M., Eckmüllner, & O. Spiecker, H. (2012), How Forest Management affects Ecosystem Services, including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs. Ecology and Society. 17(4): 50.

Gamfeldt, L., Snall, t., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L., Kjellander, P., & Bengtsson, J. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications, 4: 1340

Hämäläinen, A., Strengbom, J., & Ranius, T. (2019), Low‐productivity boreal forests have high conservation value for lichens. Journal of Applied Ecology. 57, pp.43-54.

Hernea, C, (2009). Afforestation. Ed Eurobit, Timisoara p. 105

Larson, A. J., Lutz, J. A., Gersonde, R. F., Franklin, J. F., & Hietpas, F. F. (2008). Potential site productivity influences the rate of forest structural development. Ecological Applications, 18(4), pp. 899-910.

Liang, J., Crowther, T. W., Picard, N., Wiser, S., Zhou, M., Alberti, G., Schulze, E. D., McGuire, A. D., Bozzato, F., Pretzsch, H., de-Miguel, S., Paquette, A., Hérault, B., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Barrett, C. B., Glick, H. B., Hengeveld, G. M., Nabuurs, G. J., Pfautsch, S., Viana, H., … Reich, P. B. (2016). Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science (New York, N.Y.), 354(6309), aaf8957.

MMAP, (2022), Ghidul de bune practici privind compoziții, scheme și tehnologii de regenerare a pădurilor și de împădurire a terenurilor degradate, din 28.09.2022.

Nolander, C., & Lundmark, R. (2024). A Review of Forest Ecosystem Services and Their Spatial Value Characteristics. Forests, 15(6), pp. 919.

Skovsgaard, J. A., & Vanclay, J. K. (2008), Forest site productivity: a review of the evolution of dendrometric concepts for even-aged stands. Forestry, 81(1), pp. 13-31.

Verkerk, P. J., Mavsar, R., Giergiczny, M., Lindner, M., Edwards, D., & Schelhaas, M. J. (2014). Assessing impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests. Ecosystem Services Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pp. 155-165.

van der Plas, F., Manning, P., Soliveres, S., Allan, E., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Verheyen, K., … Fischer, M. (2016). Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape-scale forest multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(13), pp. 3557-3562.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles