Modern technologies used in logging: sustainability and forest certification
Abstract
The valorization of the timber mass in accordance with the cultural and economic objectives of the forest logging requires a rigorously planned organization of the works, as well as the observance of the principles of forest certification. These issues are interconnected and require synergistic management to ensure a sustainable and responsible logging of forest resources. In this study, the main objective was to identify the most appropriate logging technologies, in accordance with FSC principle 6, which targets environmental values and their impact. The technical-economic analysis was based on data provided by Gurghiu Forest District Gurghiu, Târgu-Mureș Forest Administration, from the Sirod felling area, 601. The results obtained highlighted that the most efficient technologies for timber logging are those that involve the use horses and the articulated forestry tractor. It is essential that these technologies comply with certification requirements and standards, including responsible resource management practices and minimizing impacts on biodiversity. By implementing these measures, sustainable forest management can be ensured, protecting forest ecosystems for the future. Thus, the study emphasizes the importance of integrating modern technologies in forest management, contributing to a balanced approach between economic development and environmental protection.
References
Ampoorter, E, Goris, R., Cornelis, W.M., Verheyen, K. (2007), Impact of mechanized logging on compaction status of san dy forest soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 241(1–3): 162–174.
Bilici, E., Abdullah, E.A. (2021), Forestry and forest operations in Turkey: challenges and developments. Revista Padurilor, 136(1):37–52.
Cerutti, P.O., Tacconi, L., Nasi, R., Lescuyer, G. (2011), Legal vs. certified timber: Preliminary impacts of forest certification in Cameroon. Forest Policy Economics, 13(3), 184-190.
Covrig (Presecan), M., Covrig, I., Oroian, C. (2022), Explotation opportunity for wooden mass by multifunctional machinery. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 65(2).
Covrig, I. (2016), Exploatări forestiere. Editura Bioflux, Cluj-Napoca.
Cudzik, A., Brennensthul, M., Białczyk, W., Czarnecki, J. (2017), Damage to soil and residual trees caused by different logging systems applied to late thinning. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 38(1), 83-95.
Dudáková, Z., Allman, M., Merganiˇc, J., Merganiˇcová, K. (2020), Machinery-Induced Damage to Soil and Remaining Forest Stands—Case Study from Slovakia. Forests, 11, 1289.
Engel, A.M., Wegener, J., Lange, M. (2012), Greenhouse gas emissions of two mechanised wood harvesting methods in comparison with the use of draft horses for logging. European Journal Forest Research, 4, 1139–1149.
Eroğlu, H., Sariyildiz, T., Küçük, M., Sancal, E. (2016), The effects of different logging techniques on the physical and chemical characteristics of forest soil. Baltic Forestry, 22(1), 139-147.
Ghaffariyan, M.R., Durston, T., Sobhani, H., Mohajer MR. Mule logging in northern forests of Iran: A study of productivity, cost and damage to soil and seedlings. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2009; 30, 67–75.
Halalisan, A.F., Abrudan, I.V., Popa, B. (2018), Forest management certification in Romania: Motivations and perceptions. Forests, 9(7), 425.
Holmes, T.P., Blate, G.M., Zweede, J.C., Pereira, R., Barreto, P., Boltz, F., Bauch, R. (2002), Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance ın the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 63: 93-110.
Jourgholami, M. (2012), Environmental Impacts to Residual Stand Damage due to Logging Operations in Hyrcanian Forest. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 4(3): 65–69.
Modrý, M., Hubený, D. (2003), Impact of skider and high-lead system logging on forest soils and advanced regeneration. Journal of forest science, 49(6): 273–280.
Moreaux, C., Martin, P., Here¸s, A.M., Yuste, J.C. (2022), Effects of forestry practices on the conservation of soil and forest ecosystem health and functioning: An umbrella review protocol. OSF Preprints.
Malatinszky, Á., Csilla, F., Eszter, T.K. (2022), Which Factors Determine the Distribution of Low-Impact Horse Logging in the Hungarian State-Owned Forests?. Forests,13.11: 1959.
Naghdi, R., Lotfalian, M., Bagheri, I., Jalali, A.M. (2009), Damages of skidder and animal logging to forest soils and natural regeneration. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 30, 141–149.
Picchio, R., Mederski, P.S., Tavankar, F. (2020), How and How Much, Do Harvesting Activities Affect Forest Soil, Regeneration and Stands?. Current Forestry Reports, 6, 115–128.
Sugiura, K., Oki, Y. (2018), Reasons for choosing Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Sustainable Green Ecosystem Council (SGEC) schemes and the effects of certification acquisition by forestry enterprises in Japan. Forests, 9.4: 173.
Takahashi, T. (2011), Analysis of diffusion patterns of forest certification in Japan. Applied Forest Science, 20, 1–9, (In Japanese with English Abstract).
Timofte, A.I., Enescu, C.M. (2019), Economic aspects regarding the extraction of wood using horses: A case study. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 19(3), 599-604.
Tudoran, G.M., Cicșa, A., Boroeanu, M., Dobre, A.C., Pascu, I.S. (2021), Forest dynamics after five decades of management in the Romanian Carpathians. Forests, 12(6), 783.
Türkoğlu, T. (2011), The Timber Supplement to Forestry Industry in Respect to Sustainable Forest Management and Certification of Forest Products in Turkey, Suleyman Demirel University, Grraduate School of Appllied and Natural Sciences, 243 pages, Isparta.
Wang, L. (2000), Environmentally sound timber extracting techniques for small tree harvesting. Journal of Forestry Research, 4, 269–270.
